concrete: be used instead of steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used instead of steel 1.00
be reinforced with steel 0.84
be reinforced with steel bars 0.83
be better than wood 0.76
be stronger than limestone alone 0.76
be made from cement 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be reinforced with steel bars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(concrete, be reinforced with steel bars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be reinforced with steel bars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(concrete, be reinforced with steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be reinforced with steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be reinforced with steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concrete, be reinforced with steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than wood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be made from cement)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(concrete, be made from cement)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(concrete, be reinforced with steel bars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be made from cement)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(concrete, be made from cement)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)