concrete: be stronger than limestone alone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than limestone alone 1.00
be stronger than limestone 0.96
is limestone 0.84
be formed from limestone 0.83
be better than bricks 0.81
be better than wood 0.80
is stronger 0.79
have higher heat capacity than sand 0.78
be better than asphalt 0.77
be used instead of steel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(steel, is stronger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(steel, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(steel, is stronger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, is limestone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, is limestone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is limestone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, is limestone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steel, is stronger)