concrete: is stronger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stronger 1.00
is strong 0.83
be strengthened 0.80
be stronger than limestone 0.79
be stronger than limestone alone 0.79
is stronger then mortar 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(steel, is stronger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(steel, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(steel, is stronger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is strong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(concrete, is strong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concrete, is strong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be strengthened)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(concrete, is strong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(concrete, be strengthened)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be strengthened)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be strengthened)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger then mortar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger then mortar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steel, is stronger)