concrete: be stronger than limestone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than limestone 1.00
be stronger than limestone alone 0.96
is limestone 0.89
be formed from limestone 0.87
be better than bricks 0.81
be better than wood 0.80
is stronger 0.79
be better than asphalt 0.78
be louder than asphalt 0.76
have higher heat capacity than sand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(steel, is stronger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(steel, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(steel, is stronger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, is limestone)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, is limestone)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is limestone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, is limestone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be formed from limestone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steel, is stronger)