concrete: have higher heat capacity than sand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have higher heat capacity than sand 1.00
be hotter than water 0.79
be stronger than limestone alone 0.78
be better than asphalt 0.77
be hotter than grass 0.76
be stronger than limestone 0.76
be better than wood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)