concrete: have higher heat capacity than sand

Related concepts

Parents	flooring Weight: 0.69 , substance Weight: 0.62 , stone Weight: 0.60 , surface Weight: 0.60
Siblings	asphalt Weight: 0.55 , granite Weight: 0.35 , steel Weight: 0.35 , tile Weight: 0.35 , kidney stone Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have higher heat capacity than sand	1.00
be hotter than water	0.79
be stronger than limestone alone	0.78
be better than asphalt	0.77
be hotter than grass	0.76
be stronger than limestone	0.76
be better than wood	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than water)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than water)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than water)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than grass)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than grass)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)