concrete: be better than wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wood 1.00
be better than bricks 0.82
be stronger than limestone alone 0.80
be stronger than limestone 0.80
be better than asphalt 0.78
be hotter than grass 0.78
be hotter than water 0.76
be used instead of steel 0.76
have higher heat capacity than sand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used instead of steel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)