concrete: be better than bricks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bricks 1.00
be better than wood 0.82
be stronger than limestone alone 0.81
be stronger than limestone 0.81
be better than asphalt 0.79
is stronger then mortar 0.78
be louder than asphalt 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)