conservation: has quality resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resources 1.00
has quality resource 0.91
be one of earth 's resources 0.84
help conservation resources 0.83
be one of earth 's natural resources 0.83
conserve natural resources 0.83
conserve resources 0.82
is natural resource 0.82
be natural resource 0.82
is quality 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(recycling, conserve natural resources)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be one of earth 's natural resources)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, has quality resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(biodiversity, be one of earth 's natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be one of earth 's natural resources)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recycling, help conservation resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(recycling, conserve natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(recycling, conserve natural resources)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(conservation, has quality resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be one of earth 's natural resources)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(recycling, conserve natural resources)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(conservation, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)