conservation: is essential

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.62 , topic Weight: 0.60 , strategy Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , wildlife Weight: 0.34 , recycling Weight: 0.33 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is essential	1.00
is important gcse	0.85
is important ks3	0.85
be important to gilgamesh	0.83
is necessary	0.83
be necessary to life	0.78
be important from quality	0.78
be necessary for development	0.77
be necessary for energy	0.77
is useful	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(concept, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is essential)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(recycling, is necessary)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(conservation, is essential)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(conservation, is essential)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(conservation, is essential)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(concept, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(conservation, is essential)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(animal husbandry, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is essential)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is necessary)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is necessary)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(recycling, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(recycling, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(conservation, is essential)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(conservation, is necessary)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(conservation, be important from quality)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from quality)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(conservation, be important from quality)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(concept, is useful)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is necessary)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(biodiversity, is necessary)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(recycling, is necessary)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is essential)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(concept, is useful)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(conservation, is essential) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)