consumer: benefit from trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit from trade 1.00
benefit from global trade 0.94
benefit from bitcoins 0.87
benefit in market 0.84
help fair trade producers 0.81
help trade producers 0.81
benefit from competition 0.80
benefit from competition among businesses 0.80
benefit from industries 0.79
benefit in competitive market 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(consumer, help fair trade producers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(consumer, help fair trade producers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(consumer, help fair trade producers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(consumer, help fair trade producers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)