cost: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be high in australia 0.96
be expensive in canada 0.84
be high in canada 0.84
rise in canada 0.83
is uk 0.82
be high in ireland 0.80
be high in uk 0.80
be high in india 0.80
be low in singapore 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tuition, rise in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be expensive in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be high in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(deductible, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tuition, rise in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tuition, rise in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(deductible, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(deductible, is uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(tuition, be high in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tuition, be high in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tuition, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tuition, be expensive in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cost, be in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cost, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(deductible, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tuition, rise in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tuition, be high in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tuition, be expensive in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)