creativity: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.67
, characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, discipline
Weight: 0.66
, talent
Weight: 0.64
Siblings passion
Weight: 0.36
, imagination
Weight: 0.36
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, intellect
Weight: 0.35
, honesty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
is good quality 0.93
is important quality 0.92
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
is most important quality 0.86
has quality system 0.86
be good quality in leader 0.80
be good quality in leadership 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(imagination, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(enthusiasm, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(imagination, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(imagination, has quality better)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(imagination, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(imagination, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(enthusiasm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(enthusiasm, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(imagination, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(imagination, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(honesty, is good quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(honesty, is most important quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(imagination, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(imagination, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(creativity, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is good quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(creativity, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(creativity, is good quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(creativity, is good quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, is good quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(creativity, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(imagination, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(enthusiasm, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(imagination, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(imagination, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honesty, is good quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(honesty, is most important quality)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)