decomposition: be faster in rainforests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be faster in rainforests 1.00
be faster in tropical rainforests 0.96
be important in forest ecosystem 0.79
be important to forest ecosystem 0.79
be vital in ecosystems 0.76
be important to organisms in habitats 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)