delaware: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94
has state state 0.79
was state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(maryland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(delaware, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(maryland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(delaware, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(delaware, jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(delaware, jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(delaware, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(delaware, was state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(delaware, was state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(delaware, jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(delaware, was state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(delaware, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(delaware, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)