delaware: was state

Related concepts

Parents	state Weight: 0.60 , place Weight: 0.59 , maryland Weight: 0.58 , city Weight: 0.55 , law Weight: 0.55
Siblings	wilmington Weight: 0.56 , wyoming Weight: 0.35 , tennessee Weight: 0.34 , arkansas Weight: 0.34 , springfield Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was state	1.00
has state state	0.92
be called state	0.89
is even state	0.87
is first state	0.87
be called first state	0.85
be considered state	0.84
be considered southern state	0.79
is blue state	0.79
be state without national park	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(maryland, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(delaware, was state)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(maryland, is blue state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(delaware, was state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(delaware, was state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(maryland, is blue state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(maryland, is blue state)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wyoming, is even state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be considered state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(maryland, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(delaware, was state)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(maryland, is blue state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(delaware, was state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(delaware, was state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(arkansas, be considered state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(arkansas, be considered state)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(arkansas, be considered southern state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(arkansas, be considered southern state)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(delaware, was state)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(delaware, has state state)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(delaware, is even state)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(delaware, was state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(maryland, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(arkansas, be considered state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(arkansas, be considered southern state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(delaware, was state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(maryland, is blue state)