depth: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be in movies expensive 0.80
be more important than speed 0.80
be more important than quantity 0.78
cost money 0.77
be better than work 0.77
cost produce 0.75
be better than hard work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(effect, cost money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(effect, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(effect, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be more important than speed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than hard work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(depth, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(depth, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(depth, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(depth, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(accuracy, be more important than speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be more important than speed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(talent, be better than work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(talent, be better than hard work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talent, be better than hard work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(depth, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(depth, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(accuracy, be more important than speed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, be better than work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(talent, be better than hard work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(depth, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)