design: be taught to architecture students

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taught to architecture students 1.00
be important teaching 0.82
be important in teaching 0.81
be important in curriculum 0.79
use algebra 0.76
is learning 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(design, be taught to architecture students)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, be important in curriculum)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(design, be important in curriculum)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(design, be taught to architecture students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)