diet coke: be best with mentos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best with mentos 1.00
be best for mentos 0.97
be better for mentos 0.81
be good at time 0.79
be good at same time 0.78
be with mentos 0.78
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(diet coke, be with mentos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be with mentos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(diet coke, be with mentos)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be with mentos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)