diet coke: be better for mentos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for mentos 1.00
be best for mentos 0.84
be best with mentos 0.81
be worse than regular 0.81
be good at time 0.81
has quality worse 0.81
be good at same time 0.80
has quality good 0.78
go higher then drpepper 0.77
go higher drpepper 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(diet, be worse than regular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(diet, be worse than regular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(diet, be worse than regular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(diet, be worse than regular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diet coke, go higher then drpepper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(diet coke, go higher then drpepper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, go higher then drpepper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diet coke, go higher then drpepper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be worse than regular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be best for mentos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diet coke, be worse than regular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be worse than regular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(diet coke, be best with mentos)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(diet coke, be worse than regular)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be good at same time)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diet coke, be good at same time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(diet, be worse than regular)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(diet, be worse than regular)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diet coke, be better for mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)