diet: is more sustainable

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.63 , diabetes Weight: 0.58 , trait Weight: 0.58 , aspect Weight: 0.58 , variable Weight: 0.57
Siblings	taste Weight: 0.32 , approach Weight: 0.31 , attitude Weight: 0.31 , consumption Weight: 0.31 , flavor Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is more sustainable	1.00
be more efficient energy	0.79
be important in current global environment	0.77
be important in global environment	0.76
be better for environment	0.76
be much more stable over business cycle	0.76
be important in current environment	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(diet, is more sustainable)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(diet, is more sustainable)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(diet, is more sustainable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current global environment)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(consumption, be much more stable over business cycle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(diet, is more sustainable)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(diet, is more sustainable)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(diet, is more sustainable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(consumption, be much more stable over business cycle) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(consumption, be much more stable over business cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(diet, is more sustainable)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(diet, be more efficient energy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(diet, be more efficient energy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(diet, be more efficient energy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(diet, be more efficient energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(diet, is more sustainable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current global environment)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(consumption, be much more stable over business cycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current global environment)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(diet, is more sustainable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)