diffusion: has physical part process

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.65 , mechanism Weight: 0.62 , process Weight: 0.57 , layer Weight: 0.56 , type Weight: 0.55
Siblings	extraction Weight: 0.33 , oxidation Weight: 0.33 , fluorescence Weight: 0.33 , recombination Weight: 0.33 , hydrolysis Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part process	1.00
be important in process	0.89
evaluation of be can ongoing process	0.84
is slow process	0.84
evaluation of be can process	0.83
be important in process of selection	0.82
be important in process of natural selection	0.81
be described as process	0.81
is considered as processes	0.79
is spontaneous process	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(oxidation, is considered as processes)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recombination, be important in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of natural selection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(diffusion, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be described as process)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is spontaneous process)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(diffusion, is slow process)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(diffusion, be described as process)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(diffusion, is spontaneous process)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(diffusion, be described as process)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(diffusion, be described as process)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(diffusion, is spontaneous process)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(diffusion, is spontaneous process)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(diffusion, is slow process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(oxidation, is considered as processes)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)