dislocation: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, theme
Weight: 0.50
Siblings fracture
Weight: 0.35
, swelling
Weight: 0.35
, paralysis
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.34
, rupture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
definition 0.95
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(injury, definition)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(injury, definition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(injury, definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rupture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(injury, definition)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rupture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rupture, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fracture, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dislocation, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dislocation, definition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dislocation, definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dislocation, definition)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(injury, definition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rupture, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(injury, definition)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)