drought: be problem in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in africa 1.00
be in africa 0.92
happen in africa 0.90
be in south africa 0.88
occur in africa 0.88
be problem in mexico 0.83
be problem in australia 0.83
be in horn of africa 0.78
be in kenya 0.77
be in african savannah effect animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(drought, be in africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(drought, be in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(drought, happen in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drought, be in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(drought, be in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(drought, happen in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(drought, be in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(drought, be in south africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(drought, happen in africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(drought, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(drought, happen in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(drought, occur in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(drought, be in south africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(drought, occur in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drought, occur in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(drought, be in african savannah effect animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(drought, be in african savannah effect animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(drought, be in african savannah effect animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(drought, occur in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(drought, be in african savannah effect animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in africa)