drunk driving: is suddenly problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is suddenly problem 1.00
become problem 0.87
has state problem 0.86
be considered problem 0.85
fear of is problem 0.84
fear of is serious problem 0.83
is social problem 0.82
fear of is social problem 0.81
fear of is serious social problem 0.81
be considered social problem 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driving, become problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(driving, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(driving, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(driving, become problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drunk driving, become problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(crime, fear of is serious social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(driving, become problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(driving, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(crime, fear of is serious social problem)