eat: requires go to restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, food
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, day
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.34
, junk food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.33
, fresh food
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires go to restaurant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.93
be at restaurant 0.93
be at in restaurant 0.93
be find in restaurant 0.92
be at fast food restaurant 0.88
be serve at restaurant 0.87
be serve in restaurant 0.87
be at chain restaurant 0.84
be available in restaurant 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(eat, requires go to restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(eat, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food, be at chain restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(eat, requires go to restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)