educational system: has quality definition

Related concepts

Parents	institution Weight: 0.69 , program Weight: 0.63 , service Weight: 0.61 , aspect Weight: 0.58 , challenge Weight: 0.56
Siblings	secondary school Weight: 0.70 , financial institution Weight: 0.37 , security system Weight: 0.35 , public library Weight: 0.35 , institute Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality definition	1.00
is quality	0.82
has quality good	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(security system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(security system, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(institute, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(security system, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(security system, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(educational system, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)