ekg: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.51
, parameter
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, testing
Weight: 0.46
, device
Weight: 0.44
Siblings escort service
Weight: 0.28
, service station
Weight: 0.28
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.28
, postal service
Weight: 0.28
, think
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality wrong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ekg, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ekg, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ekg, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ekg, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ekg, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)