electronics: be costly in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be costly in india 1.00
be expensive in india 0.93
is costly 0.86
become in india 0.85
be expensive in canada 0.83
be more expensive in australia 0.83
be more expensive in uk 0.83
be expensive in australia 0.83
be more expensive in mexico 0.82
be expensive in mexico 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, be costly in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solar cell, is costly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(electronics, be costly in india)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in mexico)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in mexico)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in mexico)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in mexico)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, be costly in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(solar cell, is costly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, be costly in india)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)