engineering: be related to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to math 1.00
be to math 0.94
be related to mathematics 0.93
require math 0.89
relate to science 0.79
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(engineering, be related to math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(engineering, be related to math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(science, be related to mathematics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to mathematics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(engineering, be related to math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(engineering, be related to math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(physics, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(physics, be related to mathematics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(computer science, require math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(biology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biology, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(physics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(physics, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(engineering, be related to math)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineering, be to math)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(engineering, be to math)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be to math)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(engineering, be to math)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(engineering, require math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(engineering, require math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(engineering, require math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(engineering, relate to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(engineering, relate to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(engineering, relate to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(engineering, require math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(engineering, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(engineering, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineering, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(engineering, relate to science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(engineering, be related to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(physics, be related to mathematics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(biology, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(physics, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(engineering, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)