engineering: be related to mathematics

Related concepts

Parents	college Weight: 0.65 , department Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.63 , science Weight: 0.63 , major Weight: 0.62
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , design Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be related to mathematics	1.00
be related to math	0.93
be to math	0.88
relate to science	0.82
require math	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(science, be related to mathematics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to mathematics)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(physics, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(physics, be related to mathematics)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(computer science, require math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(engineering, be to math)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(engineering, be to math)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be to math)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(engineering, be to math)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(engineering, relate to science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(engineering, be related to math)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(engineering, relate to science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(engineering, require math)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(engineering, relate to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to math)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(engineering, be related to math)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(engineering, require math)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(engineering, require math)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(engineering, require math)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(engineering, be related to math)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(engineering, relate to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(physics, be related to mathematics)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(computer science, require math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(engineering, be related to mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics)