engineering: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	college Weight: 0.65 , department Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.63 , science Weight: 0.63 , major Weight: 0.62
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , design Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality making	0.84
be better than hard	0.77
is best	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(science, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(science, has quality bad)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(design, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(engineering, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(engineering, has quality bad)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality bad)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality bad)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(engineering, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(engineering, has quality making)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(college, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(design, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(engineering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(college, has quality good)