environment: be considered dynamic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dynamic 1.00
be considered system 0.77
be considered backbone of development 0.75
be regarded as perfect market 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be considered dynamic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be considered dynamic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(environment, be considered dynamic)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(environment, be considered system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(environment, be considered system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be considered dynamic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(environment, be considered dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market)