environment: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to science 0.82
be related to communication 0.80
is is linked with business 0.79
be linked 0.78
be related to other disciplines 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(theme, be related)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(environment, be related)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(environment, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(theme, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theme, be related)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be related to communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be linked)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(theme, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(environment, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(environment, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecology, be linked)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(ecology, be linked)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(environment, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(environment, is is linked with business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(environment, is is linked with business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(environment, is is linked with business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, is is linked with business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(environment, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(theme, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be linked)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(theme, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(environment, be related)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)