euthanasia: be problem in society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in society 1.00
be important to society 0.88
be good for society 0.87
has state problem 0.85
is social issue 0.80
is social justice issue 0.77
has state dilemma 0.76
is important issue 0.76
is issue 0.76
is moral issue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(action, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(action, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(torture, is social justice issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(torture, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(torture, is important issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cloning, is issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(torture, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(torture, is issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(torture, is issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cloning, is issue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cloning, is issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(torture, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(torture, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(torture, is important issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(torture, is important issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(torture, is social justice issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(torture, is social justice issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be good for society)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be good for society)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be good for society)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be good for society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be important to society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be important to society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be important to society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be important to society)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is important issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(torture, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cloning, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(torture, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(torture, is social justice issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(torture, is important issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)