experience: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.65
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings confidence
Weight: 0.63
, chemistry
Weight: 0.63
, attention
Weight: 0.62
, seminar
Weight: 0.62
, achievement
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
be in job 0.81
be needed in job 0.78
be good for job 0.78
be in job required 0.76
be important for job applicants 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(experience, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(experience, be in job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(experience, be in job)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(experience, be in job required)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be needed in job)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job required)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(experience, be needed in job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(experience, be in job required)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(experience, be needed in job)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(experience, be good for job)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(experience, be needed in job)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job required)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(experience, has state jobs)