experience: be good for job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.65
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings confidence
Weight: 0.63
, chemistry
Weight: 0.63
, attention
Weight: 0.62
, seminar
Weight: 0.62
, achievement
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for job 1.00
be in job 0.96
be needed in job 0.92
be in job required 0.88
be important for job applicants 0.83
has quality good 0.78
has state jobs 0.78
work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(asset, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(attribute, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tool, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tool, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(attribute, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(asset, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(philosophy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(attribute, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asset, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(achievement, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(confidence, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(asset, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(attribute, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tool, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chemistry, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chemistry, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(confidence, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(confidence, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(achievement, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(achievement, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(experience, be good for job)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(experience, be in job)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(experience, be in job)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be needed in job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(experience, be in job required)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(experience, be needed in job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(experience, be in job required)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(experience, be needed in job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job required)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(experience, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(experience, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(experience, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(experience, be needed in job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(experience, has state jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job required)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(experience, has state jobs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(experience, has state jobs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(experience, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(experience, has state jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(experience, be important for job applicants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(experience, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(attribute, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(asset, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chemistry, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(confidence, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(achievement, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(attribute, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(asset, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)