fast food chain: be used to get fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, product
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.56
, employer
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.47
Siblings fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to get fat 1.00
has oily fatty food 0.79
use duck fat to saute vegetable 0.78
be used to eat raviolli 0.77
be used to eat 0.77
be used to eat at 0.77
be used to eat out 0.77
be used to eat in 0.76
be used to get rid of hungry feel 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to get rid of hungry feel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to get rid of hungry feel)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to get rid of hungry feel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food chain, be used to get fat)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, has oily fatty food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food chain, has oily fatty food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, has oily fatty food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fast food chain, has oily fatty food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to get rid of hungry feel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fast food chain, be used to get fat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)