fibrillation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.44
, condition
Weight: 0.41
, episode
Weight: 0.38
, reason
Weight: 0.26
Siblings ventricular fibrillation
Weight: 0.31
, pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.30
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.30
, stenosis
Weight: 0.30
, aortic aneurysm
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worse 0.87
is bad people 0.80
affect water quality 0.78
hurt bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(stenosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stenosis, hurt bad)