fight: be at hockey game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, confrontation
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings strike
Weight: 0.60
, win
Weight: 0.59
, octagon
Weight: 0.37
, battle
Weight: 0.35
, motivation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hockey game 1.00
occur at hockey game between player 0.89
wants to play tennis 0.81
be at video game 0.77
be defined as goal of game 0.76
be at play 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scene, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fight, be at hockey game)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fight, be at hockey game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scene, be at play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(challenge, wants to play tennis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scene, be at play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(battle, be at video game)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(win, be defined as goal of game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scene, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fight, be at hockey game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fight, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(battle, be at video game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(battle, be at video game)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(win, be defined as goal of game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(win, be defined as goal of game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fight, be at hockey game)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fight, occur at hockey game between player)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fight, occur at hockey game between player)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fight, occur at hockey game between player)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fight, occur at hockey game between player)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fight, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scene, be at play)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(win, be defined as goal of game)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(battle, be at video game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scene, be at play)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fight, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)