fireman: have 2 jobs

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.65 , job Weight: 0.64 , public servant Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63
Siblings	firefighter Weight: 0.38 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , construction worker Weight: 0.35 , office worker Weight: 0.34 , plumber Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have 2 jobs	1.00
has state job	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(construction worker, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(fireman, has state job)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(fireman, has state job)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(fireman, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(worker, has state job)