fit: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shape
Weight: 0.34
, fitness
Weight: 0.32
, consistency
Weight: 0.31
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, type
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality right 0.90
has quality worse 0.84
has shape solid 0.79
is good school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fit, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(type, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shape, has shape solid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fit, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fitness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shape, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality right)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(shape, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(shape, has shape solid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(type, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(type, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fit, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fit, is good school)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(fit, is good school)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fit, is good school)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fit, is good school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(shape, has shape solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(type, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)