flip: is video camera

Related concepts

Parents	camera Weight: 0.54 , trick Weight: 0.53 , move Weight: 0.48 , device Weight: 0.45 , coach Weight: 0.41
Siblings	digital camera Weight: 0.31 , camera lens Weight: 0.31 , slide Weight: 0.31 , push button Weight: 0.30 , light switch Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is video camera	1.00
is camera	0.96
is video	0.91
store images in camera	0.90
get video	0.89
be called cameras	0.87
be better than film cameras	0.86
be different from cameras	0.85
get underwater video	0.83
have lens cap on camera	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(camera, be called cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(camera, store images in camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(camera, be called cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(camera, be called cameras)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(camera, store images in camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(camera, be called cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(digital camera, be different from cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(flip, is video camera)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flip, is camera)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(flip, is camera)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(flip, is video)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(flip, is video)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(flip, is camera)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(flip, is video)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(flip, is camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(camera, be called cameras)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(camera, be called cameras)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)