florida: be good state for senior citizens

Related concepts

Parents	north carolina Weight: 0.71 , california Weight: 0.70 , south carolina Weight: 0.70 , ohio Weight: 0.69
Siblings	walt disney world Weight: 0.62 , georgia Weight: 0.62 , tennessee Weight: 0.61 , indiana Weight: 0.58 , spoonbill Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good state for senior citizens	1.00
has state state	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(florida, be good state for senior citizens)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(california, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(florida, be good state for senior citizens)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(florida, has state state)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(florida, has state state)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(florida, be good state for senior citizens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(california, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(florida, be good state for senior citizens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(california, has state state)