flourish: has quality beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.47
, pattern
Weight: 0.43
, thing
Weight: 0.39
, element
Weight: 0.39
, fertilizer
Weight: 0.39
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.29
, design pattern
Weight: 0.28
, bloom
Weight: 0.28
, clothing store
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality beauty 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality beauty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality beauty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(bloom, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(bloom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bloom, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(flourish, has quality beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(flourish, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(flourish, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bloom, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(flourish, has quality beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)