foam: have conductivity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have conductivity 1.00
have low conductivity 0.97
have thermal conductivity 0.94
have low thermal conductivity 0.93
is conductive 0.82
be classified on basis of resistivity 0.79
is paramagnetic 0.78
is magnetic 0.78
is ductile 0.77
is piezoelectric 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(material, is magnetic)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(material, is magnetic)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have conductivity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have conductivity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(foam, have conductivity)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(foam, have conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)