foam: have low conductivity

Related concepts

Parents	feature Weight: 0.56 , composition Weight: 0.56 , material Weight: 0.55 , surface Weight: 0.55 , filler Weight: 0.52
Siblings	latex Weight: 0.60 , styrofoam Weight: 0.58 , adhesive tape Weight: 0.34 , silicone Weight: 0.33 , fiberglass Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have low conductivity	1.00
have conductivity	0.97
have low thermal conductivity	0.95
have thermal conductivity	0.92
is conductive	0.82
be classified on basis of resistivity	0.80
is paramagnetic	0.78
have magnetic properties weak	0.77
is good heat insulator	0.77
be good insulator of heat	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(foam, have low conductivity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(material, be classified on basis of resistivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(foam, have low conductivity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(foam, have low conductivity)

Similarity expansion

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(foam, have conductivity)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(foam, have low conductivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(foam, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(material, be classified on basis of resistivity)