foam: have thermal conductivity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thermal conductivity 1.00
have low thermal conductivity 0.99
have conductivity 0.94
have low conductivity 0.92
be poor conductor of thermal energy 0.84
is conductive 0.81
is paramagnetic 0.80
is heat insulator 0.79
have heat insulators glass 0.78
is magnetic 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(material, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(material, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is magnetic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have conductivity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(foam, have conductivity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(foam, have low conductivity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, have low conductivity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(foam, have low conductivity)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is magnetic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is heat insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)