food: be at dine room

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dine room 1.00
be at dinner 0.82
be make into dinner 0.79
be find in restaurant 0.77
be used to lunch 0.77
be at fast-food restaurant 0.76
be at restaurant 0.76
be used to eat 0.76
wants to eat 0.76
be at in restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to lunch)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(food, be at dine room)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(food, be at dinner)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(food, wants to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to lunch)