formation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality use 0.88
has quality worth 0.85
has quality difference 0.80
has shape solid 0.79
has quality definition 0.76
be in great deal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(shape, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shape, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality right)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(shape, has shape solid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality right)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shape, has shape solid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(shape, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shape, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(formation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(formation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(formation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(shape, has shape solid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(formation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(shape, has shape solid)