fox: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.85
be at field forest and in den 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fox, be at forest)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)